Chelsea Vs Fulham 1-2: Rating The Players

kobexielite 𝕯𝖎𝖌𝖎𝖙𝖆𝖑 𝕸𝖊𝖉𝖎𝖆

You need 3 min read

·

Post on Dec 27, 2024

41 visitor like this post

Share

Chelsea vs Fulham 1-2: Rating the Players – A Disappointing Day at Stamford Bridge

Chelsea's 1-2 defeat to Fulham at Stamford Bridge was a bitter pill to swallow for the Blues faithful. The performance was far from the standard expected, leaving many players needing to significantly improve their game. Let's delve into individual player ratings and assess the overall team performance.

Chelsea Player Ratings:

Goalkeeper:

• Kepa Arrizabalaga (6/10): While he couldn't prevent both goals, Kepa made a couple of decent saves and wasn't entirely to blame for the outcome. His distribution could have been sharper, though.

Defenders:

• Reece James (7/10): One of the few bright sparks for Chelsea. James offered attacking impetus down the right flank and delivered some dangerous crosses. Defensively, he had moments of brilliance but was occasionally caught out of position.

• Thiago Silva (6/10): A solid, if unspectacular performance from the veteran defender. He battled hard but showed some signs of age against Fulham's faster forwards.

• Wesley Fofana (5/10): Had a shaky game. He looked uncertain at times and was beaten too easily for Fulham's second goal. Needs to improve his concentration and decision-making.

• Ben Chilwell (5/10): Offered little going forward and struggled defensively. He was consistently outpaced and failed to provide the support needed on the left side. A disappointing showing.

Midfielders:

• Enzo Fernandez (6.5/10): Chelsea's best midfielder on the day. He dictated play in spells, showcasing his technical ability and vision. However, he couldn't single-handedly inspire a comeback.

• Conor Gallagher (5/10): A largely ineffective performance. He lacked creativity and failed to exert his usual influence on the game. He needs to improve his passing accuracy and decision-making.

• Mason Mount (5.5/10): Struggled to impact the game in a positive way. He showed glimpses of his talent but was ultimately inconsistent and failed to provide the spark Chelsea needed.

Forwards:

• Raheem Sterling (6/10): Worked tirelessly, creating several opportunities. However, he couldn't find the back of the net. A positive attitude but lacked clinical finishing.

• Kai Havertz (5/10): A frustrating game. He was wasteful in possession and failed to make a meaningful contribution in attack. His positioning could also be questioned.

• Mykhailo Mudryk (5.5/10): Showed flashes of brilliance with his dribbling skills. However, he needs to improve his decision-making in the final third and become more clinical.

Fulham Player Ratings: (Brief Overview)

Fulham's performance was impressive. Their key players delivered clinical performances, leading to the well-deserved victory. Their attacking prowess and defensive solidity proved too much for Chelsea to handle. Individual ratings for Fulham would require a separate, detailed analysis.

Overall Analysis:

Chelsea's defeat highlights several key weaknesses. The team lacked cohesion, especially in midfield and attack. Defensive frailties were exposed, leaving Kepa with little protection. The overall performance was simply not good enough for a team of Chelsea's caliber. Significant improvements are needed across the board if Chelsea are to achieve their ambitions this season. The team needs to work on improving their passing accuracy, decision-making, and overall attacking efficiency. The defense needs to improve in terms of organization and speed to shut down opponents' threats.

This match served as a stark reminder of the work still needed to be done at Stamford Bridge. The upcoming games will be crucial to see if the Blues can learn from their mistakes and bounce back stronger. A significant tactical shift might also be needed to unlock the team's full potential and to fully support the team's star players. The fans will be hoping for a vastly improved performance in the following matches.